We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect
Access AI content by logging in
A critical gun case was argued before the Supreme Court this week. But instead of opening further freedoms for gun owners — as the court, with its conservative supermajority, did in a blockbuster decision last year — justices seemed ready to rule that the government may disarm people under restraining orders for domestic violence. Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The Times, explains why.
Also from the makers of Pods.ee
Turn your X timeline into a daily podcast
Stop doom-scrolling. Listen to your feed in any podcast app.
Try ListenToX Free